05 March 2013
Preconceptions as teachable moments.
Except for a few boy and girl geniuses, we've all asked silly questions at some point or another. Actually, it is true there are no silly questions except when they are repeated . I saw a funny t-shirt that aimed to answer common questions asked to plein air painters from people that walk by and have the blessed curiosity to ask. This got me thinking about innocent, annoying or just plain repeated comments uttered by painters and workshop attendees. Many of them based in preconceptions. I've made similar comments so this isn't meant to embarrass anyone. It's about seeing the humor in their recurrence.
SOLD IT! Gone to a good home.
All in capitals. Like the ding ding ding of a casino slot machine. While sales are a wonderful validation and it is so very hard not to share your success this has to be the worst offender on Facebook. At least I find it a bit off, may be I'm wrong. Unless you are a gallery owner showing off your market prowess or the lucky seller is taking us for dinner I wonder what purpose loudly announcing sales really fulfills. Is it just just braggin'? Creating the impression that you better hurry or you'll miss out if you are a patron? If the announcement is accompanied by the actual monetary value, I'd say that would be great information, I am not advocating any sort of "discrete classiness", being an artist is a business too. This business aspect of being an artist interests me greatly, what about sharing your business plans? What about sharing your struggles, monetary or otherwise? Now THAT would be worth reading abbout. As for the "good home"...what are you selling...puppies? You know you'd sell a painting to a mafia overlord/lady if he/she came knocking.
What colors did you mix to get that color?
The eternal search for the recipe. It takes time and color charts to know your colors. Moreover, a color is meaningless unless another color sits beside it. The same grey can be a shiny green in one canvas and a neutral mud in another. While color mixes can be interesting, it is not a paint by numbers world. The formula that makes a good painting for one is the kiss of death for another. That's why we practice incessantly.
Similar to this is the issue of priming colors. "I always prime my canvas bright red (or any other color)." Self-imposed habits and rules are great but there has to be a why behind them. Similar formulas abound. For example: "Adding people sells paintings.".People and human figures add a certain scale and narrative accent to paintings of landscape. But like highlights on a glass bottle, the more you abuse this formula, the more you start to rely on it and things go downhill in a hurry. People, highlights, they all are compositional elements, not something to be "added" to guarantee sales.
"I hate to paint cars/cows/people..."
I think when people say they hate painting something specific like cars what they really are saying is: "I don't know how to see cars as a painter yet, I still see them as things and not as light and shadow." This is actually a great opening for teaching. Of course our hearts go to certain subjects, cats, flowers, women, banks on fire, the devil in high heels... but the "hating" of a subject or its difficulty lies within the painter's knowledge or experience of painting itself, not it's inherent beauty. A scene can be complex or simple but the objects in it have very little to do with whether they would make a good or a bad painting. The other side of this is that the public has similar prejudices and might not go for a superior painting based on subject matter alone. Similar to this : "The light at noon is too flat". "It's not sunny so I can't paint."etc...
Do I need to know perspective.
Yes. You do. Especially if you are going to paint buildings, interiors, even still lives . The good news is that painters don't need to calculate orthographic projections like a scenographer would or cast shadows mathematically. The perspective you need to know as a painter is very easily understood but nevertheless essential. Where's your horizon, your vanishing points, your choice of p.o.v....done.It's hard to teach this on the field but it's the perfect homework assignment. Same thing with anatomy. We need a certain level of anatomy education to paint the figure.
"I'm just experimenting. "
A failure is a failure, not an experiment. Nothing to be ashamed of..Failure is expected, even desired. An experiment limits the variables to test an unknown outcome but has a purpose. An experiment requires preparation and method. In other words, an experiment takes even more time and effort than just humming along. A train wreck is not an experiment. Move on. to the next painting or try hard to figure out what went wrong and seek advice. Failures can be as powerful or more than great paintings if we don't dismiss them as experiments.
Similar to this : "I need to finish this painting" and the very famous "The light changed so (my painting went south)" Start a new one and don't linger. It's the light changing that makes painting outdoor a challenge . Commit to a light situation and memorize it. Can't use that as an excuse.
I didn't bring sun lotion. It's your skin.
01 March 2013
A book to go with it.
20 February 2013
My first solo show is here.
My first solo show is almost here. Saturday April 6th 2013 from 5 to 7pm I will be presenting my artwork at the Segil Gallery in Monrovia, CA , just a few miles East of Pasadena.
Everybody and their mothers are invited of course.
See some of the paintings here :"Our Shared Light"
13 October 2012
Ray Roberts Day 2.
![]() |
| Hey! I'm liking my progress. |
Day two rolls around and we are treated to a day in the sun with no respite or shade. Yet, we soldier on because we have to crank them out. I'll let you know that Ray's workshop involves painting lots and lots of boards. He did THREE demos each of the three days ! Plus at least two critiques per painting. Granted it takes him an average of 30 mins. for each demo ( the only breaks we get) but they are all a delight to watch.
![]() |
| Another one of my pieces. A very simple composition. But the sea is a bumpy moving mirror and after a while one sees all kinds of hues, colors and shapes. Who said this was relaxing? |
![]() |
| Probably my least successful attempt. |
On the second day we honed in the same basic principles: design , organic shapes, color coding. Some new tips also. For example Ray demonstrated how to enhance the core shadow on rocks by adding a dark saturated color where the light turns to shadow. He also explained how to modulate a painting with atmospheric perspective through color. He said , for example, that yellow greens are the colors that first fade away with distance so foreground yellows should remain the most saturated an clean.
As for the mental state of painting, Ray said it has to be somewhat childlike. Children do not act driven by an "inner architect" that wants to organize the space and align things, they do have a natural ability to create interesting forms and designs and their intuition alone makes the avoid the pitfalls of static and boring.
![]() |
| Ray switching between left and right brain. |
![]() |
| A watercolor sketch i did of Ray teaching. |
![]() ![]() |
| Some friends asked me to post my notes. |
![]() |
| Office with a view. |
One piece of advice of particularly liked: SQUINTING is a great tool not only because it eliminates detail but also because it amalgamates value and color relationships. Especially in a marine environment where color shifts are the norm rather than the exception, squinting gives a much clearer idea of what color things add up to. Watch out for blue colors, blue color make paintings colder and people respond better to warmth in color.
Why is it that a boldly composed painting looks more realistic than one where the details have been painstakingly carved out? To sum it up: A stylized pattern makes the artwork look more real than a faithful rendering. Stylize to make your artwork look more real. By stylization we mean the crafted design that engages the eye and the color application that respects the values, belongs to a clear element in the composition and is as accurate as possible, you can push it a bit as well.
![]() |
| Ray composes an atmospheric piece or a wide view. . First the dark shapes |
![]() |
| Avoiding repetition , tangents and symmetry. |
![]() |
| The hills in the back are added in as a block. |
![]() |
| In comes the white foamy water, now with a milky hue. |
![]() |
| Everything has its color code and its design. |
![]() |
| The resolved sketch. |
12 October 2012
Ray Roberts' Workshop Day 1
I have been looking forward to take a workshop with master Ray Roberts for a long time. So when I found out he was giving one in Malibu I signed up right then and there. Ray Roberts, in my opinion, is one of the best landscapes painters alive and we are lucky that he teaches.
While I talk about his workshop on this blog, there is no substitute to taking it and seeing him work. So I consider this post mostly as a record for myself.
Ray Roberts paints "sketches" in plein air, sometimes up to ten a day. He paints them very quickly but not rushed and doesn't consider them finished paintings but just reference for larger pieces. If a sketch looks good, Ray suggests it might make a good larger piece . They are used for color reference. Along with photographs and video -yes, video is used to freeze frame for example a wave in mid-explosion- they constitute the basis for larger paintings.
Ray's palette is not necessarily fixed. Some interesting things about it: It's already spread out . There are no earth tones, Ray likes to mix reds and greens to create those. Because it's hard to keep them clean, Ray pre-mixes three small piles for highlights. White PLUS yellow, orange and red. Sometimes he also premixes some phtalo yellow green.
Ray looks for a simple statement and composition. Nothing is detailed. He usually would start by mixing a neutral color and creating the main shapes. Dark shapes first and then moving on to the other main blocks of color. He is very conscious of design and composition at this stage. One thing he emphasizes is the creation of an interesting design: no symmetries, repetitive forms, similar spaces.... I personally thought this was not a problem for me until I started working and he critiqued. What a battle it turned out to be and what a lesson. Only for the trouble I had, the workshop was worth its price several times over.
Drawing, according to Ray, is an ongoing process. To draw and then "fill in" the forms creates stiff looking paintings. He constantly makes decisions as he goes along and is not beyond moving things around to fit a better more interesting form. he likes to keep one color mix for every compositional element so for example, all the foam shadow areas will draw from the same distinct color. The rocks will have their own color, the ocean, etc... This color separation creates clarity in the elements.
I made that little graph with Monet in the center to illustrate a common rule regarding the colors of the sky. The zenith would tend to the a reddish ultramarine and as we approach the horizon we can see a shift in the hue. This is a simple rule but it underlines the importance of capturing the gradations of color that occur in big surfaces like the sky but also the ocean or even large areas of rock and foam.
Some examples of Ray's sketches. They are done very quickly and in some cases he divides the canvas to make even quicker sketches where he experiments with different color approaches. These are color and compostion notes that a photograph would never reveal. Looking at them it is easy to see why photographic reference is quite insufficient.
Ray tries to avid the expected. Always seeks the organic forms and the "ins" and "outs". Bigger forms. Also avoids earth tones that tend to dull things out. Because the light changes very often sometimes he keeps t canvases handy. One in case of sunny skies, another when the clouds roll.
There is a certain "color coding" like I mentioned , every big shape is within one color mix.
While I talk about his workshop on this blog, there is no substitute to taking it and seeing him work. So I consider this post mostly as a record for myself.
![]() |
| My first exercise after Ray's demo. Already things happening. |
![]() |
| Reductio ad minimum. Small pochade , few brushes, simpled gessoed card or plywood. |
Ray's palette is not necessarily fixed. Some interesting things about it: It's already spread out . There are no earth tones, Ray likes to mix reds and greens to create those. Because it's hard to keep them clean, Ray pre-mixes three small piles for highlights. White PLUS yellow, orange and red. Sometimes he also premixes some phtalo yellow green.
Ray looks for a simple statement and composition. Nothing is detailed. He usually would start by mixing a neutral color and creating the main shapes. Dark shapes first and then moving on to the other main blocks of color. He is very conscious of design and composition at this stage. One thing he emphasizes is the creation of an interesting design: no symmetries, repetitive forms, similar spaces.... I personally thought this was not a problem for me until I started working and he critiqued. What a battle it turned out to be and what a lesson. Only for the trouble I had, the workshop was worth its price several times over.
![]() |
| Starting the sketch with some bold neutral shapes and darks. Already design decisions are made. |
![]() |
| Premixing for highlights. |
![]() |
| Deciding where the wave should go. |
Drawing, according to Ray, is an ongoing process. To draw and then "fill in" the forms creates stiff looking paintings. He constantly makes decisions as he goes along and is not beyond moving things around to fit a better more interesting form. he likes to keep one color mix for every compositional element so for example, all the foam shadow areas will draw from the same distinct color. The rocks will have their own color, the ocean, etc... This color separation creates clarity in the elements.
![]() |
| The lead color of the morning ocean confines the warm specular highlights of the sun . Observe the softer edge of the wave crashing within the rock to the left. |
![]() |
| Even the highlights serve a compositional purpose |
![]() | ||
| Almost there. The warm highlights are the brightest element. Observe the foam of the crashing wave is not white but a shade of purple . The highlights have to stand out. |
Some examples of Ray's sketches. They are done very quickly and in some cases he divides the canvas to make even quicker sketches where he experiments with different color approaches. These are color and compostion notes that a photograph would never reveal. Looking at them it is easy to see why photographic reference is quite insufficient.
![]() |
| High Key, Normal View, High Saturation |
![]() |
| The highlights have added extra vibration by adding different color notes withing the area. |
Ray tries to avid the expected. Always seeks the organic forms and the "ins" and "outs". Bigger forms. Also avoids earth tones that tend to dull things out. Because the light changes very often sometimes he keeps t canvases handy. One in case of sunny skies, another when the clouds roll.
There is a certain "color coding" like I mentioned , every big shape is within one color mix.
04 October 2012
Rankin Ranch C.A.C. paint out
![]() |
| "Chicken Run" 9"x12" |
Arriving at a new location to paint always involves a bit of scouting and figuring out what is there that will inspire the eye. After our trip to Tejon Ranch, where the main attraction is the natural beauty, I was expecting a similar treat. While also very beautiful, Rankin Ranch's main visual appeal is the fact that is indeed a working ranch, with cowboys, cows, horses...the works. And they are not there to perform for you or planted by the County Fair. They go about their business and you can watch. Always behind the fence. Cows are temperamental that way.
It is for this reason that I'm still upset about missing the cowboys as they maneuvered the cows from the corrals early in the morning the first day. We were advised to witness it but I decided to paint the chickens above instead. It is a nice painting mind you but it doesn't compare to some of the images some other lucky artists took with their cameras. My point is: if you happen to be in a ranch like this, it might be worth thinking of it not only as a place to paint but a great place to gather reference for future studio art. You've been advised. Master of the West I am not but I wish I had been a bit more adept at chasing the action.
![]() |
| "Amanda Rankin, cowgirl" watercolor |
![]() |
| "Poncho and the goats" 8"x10" |
![]() |
| This is a working ranch, not a show |
![]() |
| The main painting subject will be cows and cowboys. |
And talking about cabins, the facilities were very nice with a large community room and a dining hall festooned with "Republican of the Year" diplomas and women in Nancy Reaganesqe hairdos . You get my point, Obama is not coming to visit and a glance at an issue of "Ranch" magazine will bring that point home in a hurry. The people in the ranch couldn't have been nicer if they tried , including the very patient cowboys (even though I suspect they liked posing for pictures because they squinted into the distance with that forlorn look that is "just so" and shifted their hip balance with a bit of sass as if a movie director was at their heels).
So city folk, if you ever happen to go paint in Ranking Ranch, make sure your camera batteries are in tip top shape and may be this is time to invest in a good lens.
![]() |
| Michael Obermeyer exploring the possibilites |
![]() |
| Moments of beauty are unpredictable and fast |
![]() |
| Early morning over the |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)















































